I apologise to everyone for bringing this up, but I couldn't let it pass. Davidjay, you say
Consequently the Giza location is also on the longest possible landmass line whether in longitude or latitude. And hence any true researcher has to come to the conclusion that the Great Pyramid’s very location was divinely inspired and NOT chosen by accident or chance.
Do you, perchance, have any evidence or calculations on the length of the landmass line in either direction that you can provide? If the GP isn't on the longest landmass line in either direction does that mean that the site WAS chosen by chance, since being on the longest landmass line leads to the inevitable conclusion that the site was divinely inspired?