You have made a prediction. Not knowing your age or condition of health I'll assume that there is at least a chance you will be alive some point after the predicted year. If none of the things you have predicted to have happened have happened I'm wondering if you will consider your theory falsified or if you will assume that you just mismeasured some part of the pyramid and adjust your calculations for a later time.
In more general terms, would you state what conditions would falsify the great pyramid as prophecy thesis?
Can you confirm that Enoch never existed or did NOT build the Great Pyramid.
I think you've got the way ideas are supported backwards. You have to provide evidence *for* your ideas in order to prove them, not just present ideas and consider them proven if no one can disprove them.
Percy,
I'm wondering if the more familiar notion of American jurisprudence about "innocent until proved guilty" with the notion that the accuser must provide evidence to convict or the accused goes free is resulting in this kind of error of logic?
Davidjay may believe that since he has put forth the claim if someone disagrees they are in fact accusing it of falsehood, putting it on trial and thus by analogy from the american court system it's the accusers job to prove it's wrong. I'm not saying this is a tight connection but many posters seem to have a similiar notion and it does seem like a parallel and could be a way to educate them on their responsibilities? or not, whaddya think?