Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,415 Year: 3,672/9,624 Month: 543/974 Week: 156/276 Day: 30/23 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Standards of Evidence
Woodsy
Member (Idle past 3395 days)
Posts: 301
From: Burlington, Canada
Joined: 08-30-2006


Message 68 of 77 (415022)
08-07-2007 6:22 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by Straggler
08-05-2007 5:09 AM


Re: The Point
quote:
I guess my thinking was that in other areas of science you actually have the opportunity to create experiments that replicate the situation under consideration. You can therefore make direct predictions on the outcome of specific directly relevant experiments.
There have been experiments done using short-lived organisms. For
example, lactose utilization in bacteria and ethanol tolerance in fruit flies. I gather that the results agreed nicely with the predictions of the evolution model.
The creos will no doubt find ways to cavil about these.
In my opinion, since the evolutionary algorithm is validated by these experiments, it is now up to the creos to show in detail how the algorithm is invalid for other organisms and on other time scales if they want to dispute these results.
Of course, even if they can do so, they still need to show positive evidence for their own model.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Straggler, posted 08-05-2007 5:09 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by NosyNed, posted 08-07-2007 6:55 PM Woodsy has not replied
 Message 72 by Straggler, posted 08-08-2007 2:43 AM Woodsy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024