Creationism museum opens in Alberta

My wife told me about this several days ago. Thanks for the reminder as I fogot to make a post about it! CBC News = Creationism museum to open in AlbertaDo you also consider a museum that promotes the Flying Spagetti Monster also a "great thing" and "long overdue"? Interesting that you would promote the museum on the grounds of a need for faith and not on the grounds that you feel a problem in science. If you have no problem with science, would it not be better to supply faith in some other method? Perhaps church or a theology class would be a better method of providing faith. It would not suprise me at all. I find it sad that instead of progress things seem to be slipping backwards in the progress of science. With fights in court and the building of such museums I would not be suprised if my great grandchildren believe the Earth to be flat and illness is caused by evil spirits.

I am not really sure, what I do know is its not science. No idea. I am trying to find a baseline to understand why you think that creationist lies are any different than the FSM and its comical alternative. I don't see how you can differentiate the two. You have any proof of this? I am sure there are thousands of doctors who are interested in their job security. Why not let creation science publish perfect science? Its not like the rules are secret. Why should you advocate "imperfect science", do you make a habit of such things in other areas or only when it comes to science? Ahh. So we do agree on something! None, but what does this have to do with creationist lies?

Actually this is not what I claimed. The original statement you made was "How much science is in the pre Big Bang Stories?". My answer was "none". If you care to supply me with some quotes or links about what science claims was factual about a PRE big bang I would be quite interested to see it. At this point I stand by my statement that there is no science in this field. That is not what I said nor what I implied. I do know about so called "creation science". I am well aware of its claims, I am well aware that each and every claim I have looked into is easily disputed, I am also well aware that they have done nothing to progress science. So you ask "What exactly is creation science?" and I answer - I do not know. It is certainly not science. If you care to explain what it is besides an empty void; false scientific claims and easily disproved hypothesis, I would be overjoyed. Evidence. Textbooks, scientists, whole fields of research producing repeatable results. The flying spaghetti monster has no such luxury - hence my reasons for comparing FSM to creation science. You make the claim that illness is caused by evil spirits and you do not think that doctors should be informed? All the years of scientific research into the health industry and years of training by these doctors and its all wrong? If an exorcist can replace doctors I do firmly believe that they should be informed. You want me to prove that there is no such thing as evil spirits that cause people illness? Besides the entire field of medical research ... Are you serious? Join the science threads and show me the evidence. Please. I mean I really am interested to read just one bit of evidence that shows a 6000 year Earth.

I brought up the FSM as a comparative to creation science. I would still like to know if you support the building of FSM museums. A more direct question is - Should people be overjoyed when museums are built on fantasy, mythology, or lies? What about if such museums are built yet portray these ideas as facts?I am not talking about the FSM. I am asking you if you are overjoyed at fantasy museums possibly being created and marketed to children as truth.--------
I got through this thread after I replied to your post #46. I see now that you do not wish to present your evidence, nor address any of the issues presented in the science threads. What you could do - present the evidence that you feel you have that contradicts the evidence that science has. Being that the topic would be yours people would have to abide by the forum rules and stay within that line of thought.

Does this mean you refuse to present the evidence you promised? Ahh, but when RAZD provided a piece of evidence you chose to ignore it. You also have refused to take part in any other thread and provide evidence to back up your claims. This is being blatantly dishonest.