Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,818 Year: 3,075/9,624 Month: 920/1,588 Week: 103/223 Day: 1/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   what is a scientific theory of creation
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 58 (4173)
02-11-2002 10:27 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by lbhandli
02-11-2002 8:12 PM


A scientific theory of creation? I think we need more emphesis if we are consider the question, what do you mean by scientific theory of creation? The origins, or a scientific creationist theory, etc
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by lbhandli, posted 02-11-2002 8:12 PM lbhandli has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by lbhandli, posted 02-12-2002 2:36 PM TrueCreation has replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 58 (4517)
02-14-2002 4:38 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by lbhandli
02-12-2002 2:36 PM


"Stop with this nonsense and provide a theory. I've already given you as much latitude as you could possibly have and your response so far was to post a could be scenario that wasn't scientific, but a "could be" scenario that was quickly pointed out to be wrong. Either provide a theory or admit you can't."
--I can provide a theory, and I will (actually I already have), my question is are you looking for a theory on creation, ie, how did god create, or just any old theory involved with a young earth?
-------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by lbhandli, posted 02-12-2002 2:36 PM lbhandli has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by lbhandli, posted 02-14-2002 4:44 PM TrueCreation has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 58 (4532)
02-14-2002 11:00 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Cobra_snake
02-14-2002 10:25 PM


"I believe what TrueCreation is asking is, do you want a flood model theory, a biological theory, a young-earth theory, etc. The concept of Creation science is too large to create an all-encompassing theory."
--Exactly, this is what I am wondering, thanx cobra.
lbhandli-->
"I meant scientific theory. What you proposed was a scenario that you claimed could be. However, it was rather quickly dispatched by gene. You need to provide a scientific theory that has not been falsified, has testable hypotheses, confirming evidence and potential falsifications."
--You mean my two theories on impact craters? That is still under way, I do think my culdra theory is quite lacking, but my other one, as I stated before I posted them, I would more readilly cling to.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Cobra_snake, posted 02-14-2002 10:25 PM Cobra_snake has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Peter, posted 02-18-2002 9:50 AM TrueCreation has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 24 of 58 (4624)
02-15-2002 3:52 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Quetzal
02-15-2002 4:36 AM


"Not a bad effort for a creationist. Feel free to jump in and help dismantle it."
--No one wanted to respond to my comments on Cobra's Theory.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Quetzal, posted 02-15-2002 4:36 AM Quetzal has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 58 (8813)
04-22-2002 9:57 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Dream Master
04-02-2002 1:33 AM


"I'm going to throw up here with so much debate"
--Hm.. Oddly, the first page you see when entering percipients page is a paragraph starting with "The debate has raged ever since Darwin and shows no signs of letting up." Is it just me or is something not quite right here?
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Dream Master, posted 04-02-2002 1:33 AM Dream Master has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Brad McFall, posted 04-23-2002 8:05 PM TrueCreation has replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 37 of 58 (9122)
04-29-2002 8:20 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Brad McFall
04-23-2002 8:05 PM


"True , ever since you put up your graphic I have known "something" was not right but stil it could only be you! "
--Hey Brad, I think I can understand your post! I think my graphic is nice, Its a minimization of a full-scale wall paper
Take a look at the full version. In my opinion it gives a whole new meaning to 'eye candy'.
http://www.promisoft.100megsdns.com/Walls/Wall2Widescreen.jpg
-Enjoy!
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Brad McFall, posted 04-23-2002 8:05 PM Brad McFall has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024