mark24 writes:
Nor is it semantics. The purpose of agreeing terms is so that a rational discussion can take place within agreed parameters,
& no semantic bullpuckey can take place. You agreed terms & are now backpedalling as fast as you can. This is simply dishonest.
I think Faith honestly doesn't understand your point. It reminds me of the joke about the janitor who was advised he shouldn't use hydrochloric acid to unclog drains because "its efficacy is inconsistent with containment integrity," and thanking them very much for their high praise he continued using hydrochloric acid.
Your cladistics argument probably seems obvious to you, but even to evolutionists it's a tough argument to follow. For example, it isn't an argument that I could successfully carry off myself, not if anyone started asking questions. I think you need to break it down more.
This message has been edited by Admin, 04-11-2005 03:57 PM
-- | Percy |
| EvC Forum Director |