Well, Pahu justed posted on another forum I go to the same garbage he posted here.
And in my experience, most reoccurring creationists just wash, rinse repeat the same arguments verbatim once they think people forgot that such arguments were refuted.
Also, the most diehard creationists tend to be extremely paranoid and have a warped sense of reality. For instance, they claim that all of science that supports evolution is a conspiracy, that journals deliberately ignore creationist's work, and all of the science for evolution is fabricated, yet when asked about those sciences in the the context of geology (particularly fossil fuels) they just run.
I'm wondering if you even understand evolution after that post.
quote:Secondly, just because you use the same word "evolution" to describe heritable change and the theory of evolution does not make them the same thing.
See my line above.
quote:Thirdly, there is absolutely no reason to assume microevolution which we know decreases genetic diversity is macroevolution which requires an increase in genetic diversity and massive one at that is microevolution writ large.
We 'know' microevolution decreases diversity? Since when? Are you making that up? Answers in Genesis perhaps? Since when did Microevolution decrease diversity?
Until you prove that micro decreases, you have no case.