Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8951 total)
37 online now:
DrJones*, dwise1, Faith, GDR, Theodoric (5 members, 32 visitors)
Newest Member: Mikee
Post Volume: Total: 866,999 Year: 22,035/19,786 Month: 598/1,834 Week: 98/500 Day: 56/42 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Even Younger Earth Creationism
obvious Child
Member (Idle past 2454 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006


Message 36 of 76 (449892)
01-19-2008 5:15 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by nwr
01-19-2008 2:43 PM


Well, Pahu justed posted on another forum I go to the same garbage he posted here.

And in my experience, most reoccurring creationists just wash, rinse repeat the same arguments verbatim once they think people forgot that such arguments were refuted.

Also, the most diehard creationists tend to be extremely paranoid and have a warped sense of reality. For instance, they claim that all of science that supports evolution is a conspiracy, that journals deliberately ignore creationist's work, and all of the science for evolution is fabricated, yet when asked about those sciences in the the context of geology (particularly fossil fuels) they just run.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by nwr, posted 01-19-2008 2:43 PM nwr has acknowledged this reply

  
obvious Child
Member (Idle past 2454 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006


Message 64 of 76 (462244)
04-01-2008 7:18 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by randman
04-01-2008 5:23 PM


Huh?

How does the existence of evolution as described by the theory of evolution not make the TOE true?

Macro evolution is merely the aggregate of micro evolution's small steps.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by randman, posted 04-01-2008 5:23 PM randman has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by randman, posted 04-01-2008 8:26 PM obvious Child has responded

  
obvious Child
Member (Idle past 2454 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006


Message 74 of 76 (462413)
04-03-2008 1:55 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by randman
04-01-2008 8:26 PM


I'm wondering if you even understand evolution after that post.

quote:
Secondly, just because you use the same word "evolution" to describe heritable change and the theory of evolution does not make them the same thing.

See my line above.

quote:
Thirdly, there is absolutely no reason to assume microevolution which we know decreases genetic diversity is macroevolution which requires an increase in genetic diversity and massive one at that is microevolution writ large.

We 'know' microevolution decreases diversity? Since when? Are you making that up? Answers in Genesis perhaps? Since when did Microevolution decrease diversity?

Until you prove that micro decreases, you have no case.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by randman, posted 04-01-2008 8:26 PM randman has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019