Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 75 (9011 total)
62 online now:
AZPaul3, driewerf, PaulK (3 members, 59 visitors)
Newest Member: Burrawang
Upcoming Birthdays: Coragyps, DrJones*
Post Volume: Total: 881,624 Year: 13,372/23,288 Month: 302/795 Week: 3/95 Day: 3/28 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Even Younger Earth Creationism
TheNaturalist
Member (Idle past 4343 days)
Posts: 86
Joined: 01-18-2008


Message 30 of 76 (449859)
01-19-2008 1:39 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dr Adequate
04-14-2007 12:59 AM


"* "Thousands And Thousands Of Years" Is Unfalsifiable

One of the criteria for a theory to be scientific is that is must be "falsifiable". The "thousands and thousands of years" theory is unfalsifiable. I just thought I'd mention this before getting back to producing my proof that it's false. No, I have never been troubled by cognitive dissonance."

If it's unfalsifiable, then how do you claim to be falsifying it eh, stupid?

And by the way, the earth is'nt "thousands and thousands" of years old. It's billions, around, say, 4.55 billion.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-14-2007 12:59 AM Dr Adequate has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Quetzal, posted 01-19-2008 2:00 PM TheNaturalist has responded

  
TheNaturalist
Member (Idle past 4343 days)
Posts: 86
Joined: 01-18-2008


Message 32 of 76 (449870)
01-19-2008 2:40 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Quetzal
01-19-2008 2:00 PM


lol well, my humor can be good. hey, look in the "new topics" forum and see my post about "impossibility of infinite abilities".

and, if you have a myspace account, why not look at my account? actually...hmm...its hard to find mine but, ill find yours if you give me some info

i can destroy any creationist in an arguement


This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Quetzal, posted 01-19-2008 2:00 PM Quetzal has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by nwr, posted 01-19-2008 2:43 PM TheNaturalist has responded

  
TheNaturalist
Member (Idle past 4343 days)
Posts: 86
Joined: 01-18-2008


Message 34 of 76 (449878)
01-19-2008 2:54 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by nwr
01-19-2008 2:43 PM


correct, and well you see, there is certainly a group of people that will not be convinced in any arguement. Some insane people believe that satan, the easter bunny, or anything is speaking to them, and no reasoning will mitigate their thoughts of such. Some creationists are no exception.

unfortunately it is impossible to have any arguement which convinces every last person of the intent of it...but such isnt necessary entirely, i'd say


This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by nwr, posted 01-19-2008 2:43 PM nwr has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by TheNaturalist, posted 01-19-2008 2:56 PM TheNaturalist has not yet responded

  
TheNaturalist
Member (Idle past 4343 days)
Posts: 86
Joined: 01-18-2008


Message 35 of 76 (449879)
01-19-2008 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by TheNaturalist
01-19-2008 2:54 PM


correct, and well you see, there is certainly a group of people that will not be convinced in any arguement. Some insane people believe that satan, the easter bunny, or anything is speaking to them, and no reasoning will mitigate their thoughts of such. Some creationists are no exception.
unfortunately it is impossible to have any arguement which convinces every last person of the intent of it...but such isnt necessary entirely, i'd say

This was of course, a reply to nwr's last message, message #33


This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by TheNaturalist, posted 01-19-2008 2:54 PM TheNaturalist has not yet responded

  
TheNaturalist
Member (Idle past 4343 days)
Posts: 86
Joined: 01-18-2008


Message 38 of 76 (450045)
01-20-2008 12:48 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Am5n
01-20-2008 2:04 AM


Re: to the science jock and his pet dog.
"I doubt you could destroy me in an argument. Why not? it's very simple.
1)I dont argue with Natural science atheists, who are taught to Deny any supernatural force/being, because Natural scientist study things that are Natural, not supernatural."

and your point is?? hmm...i guess the only other option you have is to argue with a theologin or something. Anyways, since I could make up anything supernatural with no evidence for it and yet have my arguement every bit as plausible as yours, why even argue? It becomes pointless. I could make up anything natural, like that I beat up Chuck Norris or killed a bear with a single head-butt, and it would be implausible, but not as implausible as the supernatural, since with the supernatural there is NO evidence, NOTHING to verify it WHATSOEVER.

TN writes:
And by the way, the earth is'nt "thousands and thousands" of years old. It's billions, around, say, 4.55 billion.

eh, where the fuck is your proof?

Research it. You have to be ignorant and/or scientifically inept to not realize that earth is actually very old, billions of years old, not young.

2) you seem to be a science jock, always counting how many people who, in your case, probably really didn't want to deal with your bullshit and just said "fuck it" and left. thats not really destroying a creationist kid, its just, you probably annoyed the hell out of them.

Only because they're ignorant and/or stupid and/or entirely too brainwashed by religious dogma.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Am5n, posted 01-20-2008 2:04 AM Am5n has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Am5n, posted 01-20-2008 1:36 PM TheNaturalist has not yet responded
 Message 40 by molbiogirl, posted 01-20-2008 9:21 PM TheNaturalist has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020