Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,839 Year: 4,096/9,624 Month: 967/974 Week: 294/286 Day: 15/40 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   JJ's Definition of Kind
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 7 of 12 (396476)
04-20-2007 9:23 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Nuggin
04-19-2007 4:33 PM


A "kind" of Shell Game
Baraminology has been suggested as a way to determine "KIND" but it seems simply to be another of the Christian Cult of Ignorance's ways to misdirect attention while they palm the pea and con the gullible. It makes the claim that it will be an open and scientific attempt at classification, but the dishonesty is hidden way down in the Guidelines.
In the Guidelines they admit that they will not accept any evidence or conclusions that go against or refute their already determined conclusions.
#1
Scripture claims (used in baraminology but not in discontinuity systematics). This has priority over all other considerations. For example humans are a separate holobaramin because they separately were created (Genesis 1 and 2). However, even as explained by Wise in his 1990 oral presentation, there is not much relevant taxonomic information in the Bible. Also, ReMine’s discontinuity systematics, because it is a neutral scientific enterprise, does not include the Bible as a source of taxonomic information.
from Christian Answers.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Nuggin, posted 04-19-2007 4:33 PM Nuggin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024