Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,871 Year: 4,128/9,624 Month: 999/974 Week: 326/286 Day: 47/40 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Importance of Potentially Disconfirming Evidence
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 169 of 182 (116058)
06-17-2004 1:00 PM


Has anyone posted the design explanatory filter?
If so, could it be referenced for us dummies?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Replies to this message:
 Message 170 by MrHambre, posted 06-17-2004 1:19 PM jar has not replied
 Message 171 by John Paul, posted 06-17-2004 1:29 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 177 of 182 (116095)
06-17-2004 3:14 PM
Reply to: Message 171 by John Paul
06-17-2004 1:29 PM


Re: DEF
I can see how that might be applied to future predictions, but it seems to me to fall apart with anything that already exists,
First, the probability of something occuring is totally unimportant if it happened. It happened.
Second, speaking of probabilities of something occuring is silly unless you also include large numbers of both solutions and time. The odds against winning a lottery might seem high to those who have only one ticket. Those of us with all the tickets do not find it remarkable.
In addition, buying all the tickets for every lottery makes it pretty easy to beat the odds fairly regularly.
Based on that definition I'd say ID is a crock and certainly not something worth wasting any further time on.
Thank you sir.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by John Paul, posted 06-17-2004 1:29 PM John Paul has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024