Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,838 Year: 4,095/9,624 Month: 966/974 Week: 293/286 Day: 14/40 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On The Philosophy of, well, Philosophy
Ben!
Member (Idle past 1426 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 69 of 307 (431409)
10-30-2007 10:24 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Quetzal
10-24-2007 11:58 AM


Quetzal,
I really, really disdain philosophy. And I'm not religious myself, at least as far as I am aware.
With that said, the issue I have with your OP is this: questions which you may interpret as questions about truth; questions which religious people themselves believe are questions about truth: they are often not about truth at all! That's why we see the constant moving of goalposts, the convoluted responses to HARD DATA. Because it is not truth that is being sought.
That's why your lumping of religion and philosophy in your response seems very poor to me (even understanding that you were responding to a question where that was also the case). In religion, truth is often not sought. In philosophy, as a discipline (but not necessarily in practice) it is.
I can tolerate religion and understand it as simply a completely different approach to understanding than science. To me, philosophy is just a big lie. It's value lies not in truth, but in the same allegorical methods employed in fiction.
Ben

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Quetzal, posted 10-24-2007 11:58 AM Quetzal has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-30-2007 10:59 PM Ben! has replied

Ben!
Member (Idle past 1426 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 73 of 307 (431418)
10-30-2007 11:36 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by Archer Opteryx
10-30-2007 10:59 PM


Hi Archer Opertix.
You imply here that 'hard data' and 'truth' matter to you.
Why?
I'm happy to answer the question, but afraid that doing so might pull the thread off-topic. I hope it will suffice to say that my enduring respect for religion comes from the fact that I don't have a principled answer to this question.
If you're looking for more, feel free to email me or try & help me understand how the question relates to the topic, so that I can answer in a way that will promote addressing Quetzal's original questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-30-2007 10:59 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-31-2007 12:46 AM Ben! has replied

Ben!
Member (Idle past 1426 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 76 of 307 (431424)
10-31-2007 1:13 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by Archer Opteryx
10-31-2007 12:46 AM


Please, seriously, stop it. What you are doing is extroadinarily frustrating, and leaves me with zero interest in discussing with you. Feel free to be an annoyance, but I simply won't respond to you.
You are fundamentally and willfully breaking the implicit agreement that people make, to attempt to understand each other and work together to establish communication. That is sophistry. That is annoying. That pisses me off.
I *WAS* happy to tell you my thoughts, but not because I wanted to argue or convince you, simply to inform you of my internal state. I told you, I hate philosophy. I have no interest in discussing the philosophy of my position in order to determine "right/wrong" or "correct/incorrect". I only had interest in letting you ask questions to facilitate making your own decisions about yourself.
Fortunately for me (in your eyes), I am no longer happy to discuss anything with you. You lose, go away.
Seriously, please don't reply to this message. Show me at least that amount of respect.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-31-2007 12:46 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-31-2007 3:16 AM Ben! has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024