3 online now:	CosmicChimp, PaulK, Percy (Admin)
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,423 Year: 3,680/9,624 Month: 551/974 Week: 164/276 Day: 4/34 Hour: 1/0

EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

The Nature of Scientific Inquiry - Contrasted with Creation "Science"

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: The Nature of Scientific Inquiry - Contrasted with Creation "Science"

mike the wiz

Member

Posts: 4755

From: u.k

Joined: 05-24-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 125 of 265 (131129)
08-06-2004 9:21 PM

Reply to: Message 124 by nator
08-06-2004 9:19 PM

What about from a creation scientists point of view? Or isn't he a true scientist.

Hahaha

This message is a reply to:
	Message 124 by nator, posted 08-06-2004 9:19 PM		nator has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 126 by CK, posted 08-06-2004 9:30 PM	mike the wiz has not replied
	Message 127 by nator, posted 08-06-2004 9:36 PM	mike the wiz has replied

mike the wiz

Member

Posts: 4755

From: u.k

Joined: 05-24-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 128 of 265 (131138)
08-06-2004 9:45 PM

Reply to: Message 127 by nator
08-06-2004 9:36 PM

Now now, that's the scotsman fallacy. Why are they called scientists?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 127 by nator, posted 08-06-2004 9:36 PM		nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 129 by CK, posted 08-06-2004 9:48 PM	mike the wiz has replied
	Message 154 by Loudmouth, posted 08-09-2004 2:46 PM	mike the wiz has not replied

mike the wiz

Member

Posts: 4755

From: u.k

Joined: 05-24-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 130 of 265 (131143)
08-06-2004 9:53 PM

Reply to: Message 129 by CK
08-06-2004 9:48 PM

My friend, you are caught up unwittingly - in a silent battle ground. I don't even defend creationists.

I'm just trying to annoy Schraff. For all I know - creation scientist are infact not upholding the scientific methodology - as Schraff said. (Me is crafty) but not creo!

This message is a reply to:
	Message 129 by CK, posted 08-06-2004 9:48 PM		CK has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 131 by CK, posted 08-06-2004 9:55 PM		mike the wiz has replied

mike the wiz

Member

Posts: 4755

From: u.k

Joined: 05-24-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 133 of 265 (131152)
08-06-2004 9:59 PM

Reply to: Message 131 by CK
08-06-2004 9:55 PM

Well, it's still a valid question I asked on behalf of creationists.

So - I still think I should have asked it. So, complain to the admin instead of making me suffer your newbie babble.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 131 by CK, posted 08-06-2004 9:55 PM		CK has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 134 by CK, posted 08-06-2004 10:02 PM		mike the wiz has replied

mike the wiz

Member

Posts: 4755

From: u.k

Joined: 05-24-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 135 of 265 (131156)
08-06-2004 10:06 PM

Reply to: Message 134 by CK
08-06-2004 10:02 PM

I asked about a creo scientists point of view, knowing that Schraff is most knowledgable, and might be able to inform me. Don't have me tare you a new one on a technicality.

How can it be a valid question when you don't actually know?

I'm asking because I don't know.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 134 by CK, posted 08-06-2004 10:02 PM		CK has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button