Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 53 (9179 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: Anig
Upcoming Birthdays: Theodoric
Post Volume: Total: 918,057 Year: 5,314/9,624 Month: 339/323 Week: 183/160 Day: 0/19 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Best evidence for Creation
obvious Child
Member (Idle past 4222 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006


Message 58 of 176 (477195)
07-31-2008 12:50 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by ICANT
07-31-2008 12:44 AM


Re: Try honesty
quote:
The scientific answers for the existence of the universe is the best evidence for a Creator because it makes just as much sense.
Hardly. That is nothing more then "don't know now? Goddidit." Your reasoning is why Animism came to be.ignorance looking for answers creates its own God.
There is no evidence for creation because creationism never happened.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by ICANT, posted 07-31-2008 12:44 AM ICANT has not replied

  
obvious Child
Member (Idle past 4222 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006


Message 126 of 176 (477576)
08-05-2008 1:04 AM
Reply to: Message 121 by Brian
08-04-2008 12:36 PM


quote:
Maybe creationists should take a step back and realise just how poor their position is scientifically.
Well if they did that, they wouldn't be creationists.
There is no empirical evidence for creation. In fact, YEC has problems that extend well into the philosophical, namely that God must be a giant liar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Brian, posted 08-04-2008 12:36 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by Brian, posted 08-05-2008 3:29 AM obvious Child has replied

  
obvious Child
Member (Idle past 4222 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006


Message 132 of 176 (477662)
08-06-2008 2:30 AM
Reply to: Message 127 by Brian
08-05-2008 3:29 AM


You don't know?
Money-fool-separators.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by Brian, posted 08-05-2008 3:29 AM Brian has not replied

  
obvious Child
Member (Idle past 4222 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006


Message 146 of 176 (481422)
09-10-2008 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by Open MInd
09-10-2008 12:50 AM


Re: Proof of Creation
quote:
The idea of simple is that it does not have to be created.
That logic is complete nonsense.
Simplicity does not mean no creator. I bought a simple pencil. Does that mean it just appeared from nothing? H20 is a simple molecule. Does that mean it wasn't created from the joining of two hydrogen and one oxygen atoms?
Edited by obvious Child, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by Open MInd, posted 09-10-2008 12:50 AM Open MInd has not replied

  
obvious Child
Member (Idle past 4222 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006


Message 161 of 176 (486106)
10-16-2008 1:52 AM
Reply to: Message 154 by Kevin123
10-12-2008 12:26 AM


Re: Origins again
quote:
I agree, unfortunately religion seems to be holding ID back. I think fewer people would have a problem accepting ID as a scientific theory if religion was not always brought up.
Incorrect. Intelligent Design is holding Intelligent design back.
ID is nothing more then animism. If we cannot explain something now, therefore Goddidit. The water cycle was too complicated in the past to describe and explain and therefore it belonged to the realm of Gods who we had to placate with dances. Now that we understand it, we have abandoned the idea that Gods are responsible for the rains. Right now, instead of rain, it's complex biological functions and origins. In time we will determine how and why.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 154 by Kevin123, posted 10-12-2008 12:26 AM Kevin123 has not replied

  
obvious Child
Member (Idle past 4222 days)
Posts: 661
Joined: 08-17-2006


Message 172 of 176 (486793)
10-24-2008 4:31 PM
Reply to: Message 169 by wardog25
10-23-2008 9:48 AM


Because creationists like Snelling violate known issues such as testing non-cogenetic samples. And then they lie about testing homogeneous ones. A simple understanding of basic testing rules can easily show why a few examples of testing are deviant.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by wardog25, posted 10-23-2008 9:48 AM wardog25 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024