quote:
Originally posted by Cobra_snake:
1)PLEASE do not turn this debate into one of these topics. These topics should be discussed in other forums.
My main arguments against evolution are:
1. Abiogenesis
2. Mutation-Selection
3. Puncuated Equilibrium
These are the sections of the theory in which I find the most unconvincing for evolution.
2)It would not be as difficult to disprove the Atomic Theory, if indeed it were false. This is because the Atomic Theory is not too broad.
1)(just in case this got buried out of sight):
Just for reference could you please write a brief synopsis of what these terms mean to you, how they are supposed to work and how you find that explanation unconvincing....
This should result in a more focused debate....
2)Atomic theory not broad? How so?