It's pretty telling that the editor in chief is one Andrew Snelling. The same Andrew Snelling that is lampooned here:
Will the Real Dr Snelling Please Stand Up?
Apparently Dr. Snelling has a legit Phd from a reputable university, but posts two types of articles: 1) Creo-babble and 2)legit uranium deposit research. It's absolutely clear that he conducts real research seperate from his creo-babble ways so that he can hang his hat on publishing in actual peer reviewed journals and collect his shill-money from ICR and the like.
When the editor in chief goes to these great lengths of deception, how can this possibly satisfy the demands of the scientific community for peer reviewed research?
As an aside, for those of you higher up in the academic community, is there any mechanism by which one can have his phd rescinded? Surely this kind of behaviour would violate most, if not any, ethical requirements.