Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,771 Year: 4,028/9,624 Month: 899/974 Week: 226/286 Day: 33/109 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Do we have evidence against the supernatural?
Phat
Member
Posts: 18335
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 34 of 106 (248563)
10-03-2005 2:07 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Chiroptera
10-02-2005 1:58 PM


Chiroptera writes:
Since one cannot disprove fairies, elves, or the Invisible Pink Unicorn, at what point do you accept that absence of evidence is evidence of absence?
Its not at what point do I? Its at what point need I?
Nuggin writes:
You are asking us to prove the negative. That's nearly impossible. For example, "do we have evidence against Bigfoot?" What would evidence against bigfoot be? We'd have to clearcut the entire pacific northwest and go inch by inch checking under rocks to prove that it wasn't there.
We need not clearcut the northwest...just allow those who have seen Bigfoot to tell us about him. Do we have to know the entire Universe in order to prove God?
This message has been edited by Phat, 10-03-2005 12:09 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Chiroptera, posted 10-02-2005 1:58 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Nuggin, posted 10-04-2005 12:03 AM Phat has not replied
 Message 105 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 12-28-2005 10:17 PM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18335
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 84 of 106 (251696)
10-14-2005 9:28 AM
Reply to: Message 82 by mike the wiz
10-14-2005 8:48 AM


Irrefutable Agnostic
Mike, since when did you become an agnostic? Is irrefutability a thing of the past? If so, join the club. The only thing that I am sure about is that I am sure about nothing!
Back on Topic, DO we have evidence against the Supernatural?
  • It does not occur on a documentable, regular, or predictable basis. It could be, however, that "it" has intelligence and is hiding from us.
  • Many many documented personal encounters with the unknown. Aside from the sensationalist hoaxes, are we to conclude that ALL of these people were simply mentally ill or deluded?

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 82 by mike the wiz, posted 10-14-2005 8:48 AM mike the wiz has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 85 by Funkaloyd, posted 10-14-2005 10:24 AM Phat has not replied
     Message 86 by crashfrog, posted 10-15-2005 12:42 PM Phat has replied

      
    Phat
    Member
    Posts: 18335
    From: Denver,Colorado USA
    Joined: 12-30-2003
    Member Rating: 1.0


    Message 87 of 106 (252025)
    10-15-2005 4:39 PM
    Reply to: Message 86 by crashfrog
    10-15-2005 12:42 PM


    Re: Irrefutable Agnostic
    You have a point, but you are a fundamentalist atheist, so that *could* skew the interpretaions of the results, somewhat. Who can say who is sane or insane? Logic is not limited to the sane.
    At least I've been told that you were a fundamentalist atheist....is that true?
    This message has been edited by Phat, 10-15-2005 02:40 PM

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 86 by crashfrog, posted 10-15-2005 12:42 PM crashfrog has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 88 by crashfrog, posted 10-15-2005 5:04 PM Phat has not replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024