The definition of science: What should it be?

I really can't see why you are getting upset with Crash over what he said.
When I read his response, I thought it was about one of the nicest and most reasonable things he has ever written on this forum.You should see the kind of stuff he writes to people once he has decided that they are jerks This forum is all about learning, not just arguing a point.

I dunno about that. Di-mentalism sounds like a very interesting concept.

I am so fed up with seeing this little gem of inaccuracy trotted out.Crash beat me to it by pointing out that that atheism predates Evolution and therefore cannot possibly have it as a basis.
But my problem is that you have just joined the list of people who are telling ME what I believe in without actually trying to find out for real.
I am an atheist!
I LACK a belief in God. period.
I do NOT believe that there is no God.
I was an atheist long before I knew the first thing about evolution.Oh and BTW. Welcome to EVC

Seconded.In the face of comments like that it becomes painfully obvious that we are wasting our time.
I also fear that we could easily slip back into the dark ages if this kind of thought becomes prevalent in those who make the laws.
This is the perfect example of why scientists fight so hard to keep ID and other nonsense, out of the class room

Funny you should say that since my answer was to RGB and not YOU.