Mind if I butt in.
Would you care to comment on the statement that "Darwinism" (or the modern theory of evolution) is not a scientific theory? What, in your opinion, makes people issue such a statement?
I asked a question about what we could evolve into, or where evolution was taking us, (which I later realised was asking the theory to make a prediction {a fundamental part of scientific theories}), I got this answer:
Jar writes:
You seem to think that evolution has some directionality? It doesn't.
It's simply a history of what did happen.
bold added for emphasis
If this were true, then I wouldn't consider the TOE a theory nor science. Not that I believe this, but this is the sort of thing that
makes people issue such a statement.
™ Version 4.2