Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,421 Year: 3,678/9,624 Month: 549/974 Week: 162/276 Day: 2/34 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Theories of Cosmological Origins: Are They Science?
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5541 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006


Message 50 of 115 (460806)
03-19-2008 5:33 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by ICANT
03-18-2008 6:10 PM


Re: early predictions/measurements of CMB
Turns out that the dynamical equilibrium model is wrong, though. This is a very old model that had to be abandoned because it could not explain the CMB. More recent data like the time delated decay curves of distant supernovae confirms that the red-shift cannot be explained that way. Moreover, the evidence for dark matter has build up to a level that it is not unreasonable to characterise it as extremely likely.
Edited by fallacycop, : Some typos and clarifications

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by ICANT, posted 03-18-2008 6:10 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by ICANT, posted 03-19-2008 9:31 AM fallacycop has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024