Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationists Cannot Define "Kind".
Brian
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 15 of 69 (36906)
04-13-2003 3:09 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Budikka
04-13-2003 2:19 PM


Hi Buddika,
I think being unable to define 'kind' is one of the lesser problems for a creationist. Look at what else they have to blindly accept, the whole flood episode must be a total nightmare for anyone with an IQ over 10 to defend. The many different translations of the Bible and its many contradictions and impossibilities are ignored by creationists. The fact that EVERY dating technique supports a very old earth, well relatively old compared to Bible chronology, doesn't mean a thing to these guys.
Morons like Kent Hovind, Ken Ham, Henry Morris, Ron Wyatt and Carl Baugh get validation from eager xians who cannot be bothered to get off their butts and do some real studying. Do you really think that being unable to define 'kind' will make the slightest bit of difference to these people?
These people live in a different world from me and you, they live in a fantasy world where unicorns play, a man can kill a thousand men with a bone, men can live inside whales for days, and 1+1+1=1.
These people, the Hovinds and the Wyatts, are psychologically unsound, there's no other conclusion to make. We all know enough about Hovind to know that if he lived in the UK he would be sectioned under the mental health act by now. I do think though that people are starting to realise that Hovind is brain dead and are starting to believe that his 'scholarship' is embarrassing.
Anyway, keep up the good work, if enough people can get together and expose these morons for what they are then maybe the world will be a safer place for us normal folks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Budikka, posted 04-13-2003 2:19 PM Budikka has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by crashfrog, posted 04-13-2003 7:44 PM Brian has not replied
 Message 23 by Brad McFall, posted 04-15-2003 1:38 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 24 of 69 (37122)
04-16-2003 1:33 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Brad McFall
04-15-2003 1:38 PM


Re: reader reading

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Brad McFall, posted 04-15-2003 1:38 PM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Brad McFall, posted 04-16-2003 1:58 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 26 of 69 (37129)
04-16-2003 2:16 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Brad McFall
04-16-2003 1:58 PM


Re: reader reading
Oh, everything is so much clearer now.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Brad McFall, posted 04-16-2003 1:58 PM Brad McFall has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4959 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 56 of 69 (37649)
04-23-2003 4:30 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by Budikka
04-22-2003 9:32 PM


Hey Budikka,
You are beginning to sound a lot like J P Holding (Turkelman) LOL.
I think your replies to Brad are really uncalled for and simply make you look like the villian of the piece.
Just to let you know that you are losing a lot of respect by responding to sincere members of this forum in that manner.
Best Wishes.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Budikka, posted 04-22-2003 9:32 PM Budikka has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Brad McFall, posted 04-23-2003 11:46 AM Brian has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024