Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (8908 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 05-25-2019 9:11 PM
25 online now:
AZPaul3, edge (2 members, 23 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WeloTemo
Post Volume:
Total: 852,042 Year: 7,078/19,786 Month: 1,619/1,581 Week: 441/393 Day: 32/43 Hour: 0/1

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Methodological Naturalism is fallacious
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member

Message 6 of 50 (514402)
07-07-2009 9:56 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by mike the wiz
07-07-2009 6:40 AM

Science is great when it comes to analyzing natural processes, repeatable experiment, and so forth. But when it comes to evolution, whether chemical or biological, you MUST include assumptions about questions pertaining to God. Such theories depend on a designer not being involved.

Even though God was involved, the Thoery of Evolution is the best explanation for how He did it. It doesn't matter to the uncanny accuracy of the ToE whether or not a designer was involved nor does the ToE depend on a designer not being involved.

Your premise is false.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by mike the wiz, posted 07-07-2009 6:40 AM mike the wiz has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019