Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 77 (8908 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 05-25-2019 4:55 AM
20 online now:
CosmicChimp (1 member, 19 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WeloTemo
Post Volume:
Total: 852,011 Year: 7,047/19,786 Month: 1,588/1,581 Week: 410/393 Day: 1/43 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Methodological Naturalism is fallacious
Granny Magda
Member (Idle past 31 days)
Posts: 2380
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007


Message 8 of 50 (514426)
07-07-2009 12:45 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by mike the wiz
07-07-2009 6:40 AM


Argument in a Box
Hi Mike,

quote:
(edit. I should add that yes I am aware that pure science on a smaller scale, also logically assumes that God isn't necessarily involved. However - I will let you figure out the rest. Rest-assured, I have thought it all through, as per usual.)

Huh? To me, the above reads like this;

I am aware that there is a glaring hole in my argument, big enough to drive a monster truck through, but I assure you, I have an ingenious solution to this problem. I keep it locked in a box, which is buried in my back garden.

What? You want to look inside the box?

No. Sorry.

I can assure you though, that I just took a look inside the box myself, and the argument is there. It's very convincing. Trust me on this.

Can you see why I'm not very impressed yet? How about it Mike? Can we see inside the box?

Mutate and Survive


"The Bible is like a person, and if you torture it long enough, you can get it to say almost anything you'd like it to say." -- Rev. Dr. Francis H. Wade
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by mike the wiz, posted 07-07-2009 6:40 AM mike the wiz has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019