Author
|
Topic: Is Psychology All Bunk?
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Message 35 of 50 (640735)
11-12-2011 11:26 AM
|
|
|
Sigh. Of course Psychology is a science: it follows the scientific method. The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 37 of 50 (640738)
11-12-2011 11:55 AM
|
Reply to: Message 36 by Phat 11-12-2011 11:40 AM
|
|
Re: Hiding behind psychological evaluations
That's a problem for the legal system. I think the criminally cannot be rehabilitated so they should be locked up forever. You are never going to be safe around someone with narcissistic or antisocial personality disorder. The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 36 by Phat, posted 11-12-2011 11:40 AM | | Phat has seen this message but not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 40 of 50 (640755)
11-12-2011 3:06 PM
|
Reply to: Message 39 by Rahvin 11-12-2011 1:30 PM
|
|
Re: Hiding behind psychological evaluations
The difference between their behavior and personality before and after medication is staggering. Yup. State and trait are very importantly different. The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 39 by Rahvin, posted 11-12-2011 1:30 PM | | Rahvin has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 42 of 50 (640875)
11-13-2011 9:05 PM
|
Reply to: Message 41 by Theodoric 11-13-2011 7:11 PM
|
|
Re: Hiding behind psychological evaluations
I think that Phat means that the perp is not held ethically accountable, if considered insane for their crimes. The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 41 by Theodoric, posted 11-13-2011 7:11 PM | | Theodoric has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 43 by Theodoric, posted 11-13-2011 11:01 PM | | Larni has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 46 of 50 (640911)
11-14-2011 8:31 AM
|
Reply to: Message 45 by Theodoric 11-14-2011 8:00 AM
|
|
Re: Hiding behind psychological evaluations
Yeah, I worked in an acute admission secure unit in a previous life: not nice places at all. The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 45 by Theodoric, posted 11-14-2011 8:00 AM | | Theodoric has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Message 49 of 50 (640995)
11-15-2011 5:14 AM
|
Reply to: Message 48 by Rahvin 11-14-2011 6:54 PM
|
|
Re: Hiding behind psychological evaluations
You're right of course. However, I would feel terribly uncomfortable in a room with a narcissist or a psychopath. The same way I would feel if I left my child in a room with someone who thought it was okay to molest children. If someone thinks it is justifiable to act in an antisocial way I see no benefit for them to be in society. Harsh? Very. But I'm not trying to defend my position, more to highlight it. The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 48 by Rahvin, posted 11-14-2011 6:54 PM | | Rahvin has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 50 by Rahvin, posted 11-15-2011 1:52 PM | | Larni has not replied |
|