What is an Articulate Informed Creationist

I usually do not respond to insult or invective. The comment above, at face value, appears insulting - but it really is not.Of course the comment presupposes that I (a Creationist) have been bested in debate due to my inability to think. Since the comment was written by an Evolutionist, logically, it means the exact opposite. It is a compliment to be "insulted" this way by an Evolutionist. Anytime that I (or any Creationist) is complimented by the Evolutionist it is the best evidence that we are like them (= morons). Evolutionists believe apes morphed into men and that the appearance of design that is overwhelmingly seen in nature does not reflect invisible Designer but a stupid blind process (natural selection) that only exists in their head. They also believe that all living things evolved from one common ancestor that lived hundreds of millions of years ago. Intelligent persons, after remembering this, can see why it is a compliment to be rejected (and insulted) by persons who believe these atheistic and nonsensical things.I am very glad evolutionists reject and insult me; their approval would prove my wrongness - glad I didn't get it.As for the topic title: "What is an Articulate Informed Creationist" it is ridiculous! As if any evolutionist is going to say that a Creationist is as such! If any evolutionist says that a Creationist is as such then that person is not a real Creationist.This whole topic is silly and should be shut down.Ray Edited by Cold Foreign Object, : No reason given.

It is not a book, it is a large paper that will appear on-line. My work will wipe the smile off of your face, that is, the one I see underneath the words you write.NosyNed wondered aloud why I do not publish my evidence before I get scooped as this is what persons do who have produced original evidence. I never had a chance to tell him that his admonition is a constant and traumatic concern of mine. But I have no choice since I cannot publish what I have until finished or it will not make sense. I am going as fast as I can.Arach: my work will wipe the smile off of your face. We (= Creationists) have refuted your theory and there is nothing you can do about it.For what they are worth, thanks for the compliments.Ray

In an earlier post I stated and argued a self-evident axiomatic fact: Whoever the Atheist-evolutionists praise is the most pseudo and wrong and whoever they condemn is the most right and threatening to their dogma.Since PaulK is the epitome of an Atheist-evolutionist, and since he says I am the very least or worst (or any other synonym) this logically means that I am the exact opposite. Logic says the Atheist-evolutionist WOULD NEVER approve of a real Christian-Creationist. PaulK's condemnation means I am exactly that.Recently, the Atheist-evolutionists over at TalkOrigins voted me "Chief Loon" almost unanimous. Logically, this means I am the exact opposite.RayEdited by Cold Foreign Object, : No reason given.

As if Buzsaw is dumb and naive to agree with a Atheist-evolutionist (PaulK) against a fellow Creationist."This type of coercion worked on TEists ("Christian" evolutionists) maybe it will work again as needed" = that is what PaulK is attempting to do.PaulK has lost every debate that I have encountered him. If his intellect was able he would not need another Creationist to give him a victory by reverse psychology.Ray

There is no insult to be considered a loon by Atheists in sheeps clothing or persons who correspond to Judas the Betrayer. In fact, it is the very best endorsement of my correctness to be rejected by Darwinists of any stripe and traitors. Their approval would certainly make me a loon and a moron. Extreme Fundamentalists, whether Atheist or Protestant, reject all evidence that contradicts their dogma. Again, we are glad these types are not in our camp.Ray

Does the fact that you are a narrow minded hateful "Origin of Species" thumping Atheist have anything to do with your definition as to what constitutes rational thinking?How rational is Evolution, or Materialism, or the belief that apes morphed into men over millions of years? The Bible records a lot of miracles but apes becoming men is not one of them.You are undoubtedly the least rational person at EvC since you have no problem putting on your Admin hat to exact what your "rationality" cannot from opponents. In fact it is the Atheist way of the 20th century; whether Atheist Russia or China or Southeast Asia: ban your opponents or murder them. Surely you are objective enough to admit that Atheist rationality does not exist in lieu of what I just mentioned? In fact as soon as Atheists (Darwinists) got judicial power in the 20th century they made Creationism illegal. "Suddenly" a Document that was written in the 18th century "said" the theory which says God created reality is illegal.History shows your sense of what is rational is the most irrational. In the decades to come we will reverse the corruption of the Constitution and Creationism will enjoy full protection as a scientific theory. Atheist-Darwinian "rationality" will be exposed for what it was: Third-World censorship via corruption of the Constitution.Ray