Welcome to the fray, Pete OS.
If your asking how I reconcile my views of science with my views of inerrancy of the Bible...well, if you have seen a few other threads I have started such as “How Literal is Genesis” in the Faith and Belief forum; you can see I haven't arrived at that yet. It has only been a handful of months since I started concerning myself with it.
I'm wondering if you are up to posting a Belief Statement thread on
Columnist? There are a couple of examples there to look at.
As silly as this sounds to us, they truly believe mainstream scientists are closed minded and/or protecting their career, and that only the general population will truly be receptive to the TRUTH.
Or that is the party line anyway. Where I fault them is not taking out references to known misinformation, fallacies and frauds. Sure they say Hovind is unreliable, but they don't say that he is spreading false information. That inability to police their own website for misinformation, fallacies and fraud makes all their pages unreliable.
Do you know of any creationist site that does either answer the refutations or change their pages?
Enjoy.
Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.
™ Version 4.2