I am still amazed that there are people that believe that evolution is possible when we have so many bio-chemist pointing to the fact the bio-chemically it is impossible.
You give an example of bacteria. Did you run a DNA test on every single bacteria and compare the genetic structures or are you just guessing what might be causing the results you are looking at? Seems to me you are just guessing and trying to make the results fit based on a bias.
Lets take the examples of the millions of generations of fruit flies that have been studied year after year. Have biologists successfully mutated a single new species out of these fruit fly studies? Nope.
So lets equate the millions of generations of fruit flies that biologist can not get to form a new species to a pride of lions. If you cant make a single genetic mutation in a fruit fly after millions of generations, how can you expect anyone to believe the theory would affect a pride of lines to evolve into a lion with 6 legs that can run twice as fast?
Even if you could successfully mutate a fruit fly into a new species after a million generations, are you sure you have enough time to mutate a protozoa to a humpback whale in the projected age of the earth?
The reason evolution is not a law is because it does not work. If you want to say that a Galapagos parrots beak gets shorter after 30 generations because of lack of water...ok..but does that make it a different species? Will it ever be a different species? No.
Physics laws and chemical laws can be testes and re-tested hundreds of times with the same results within a standard deviation of error.
Biologist simply surmise what might happen and what could happen if these 23,574 variations all came together when a bolt of lightning struck a soup of amino acid chains.
Talk about a leap of faith.
Biology does provide a good service by developing better crop formulas and vaccines and the like, but evolution is as bad as religion...give it up.
Syrus
™ Version 4.2