quote:
Originally posted by Darwin Storm:
Also, my questions still stands. Do YECist believe that the scientific method is faulty? How do you reconcile theories that conflict with a young earth , but obviously make predicitions that can be seen today, and/or are used in modern technology, thus supporting their validity?
Also, why do YEC's seem to focus on evolution as the competing theory? It seems that geology and physics (specifically astrophysics) seem to be more conflicting with an YEC viewpoint. Why aren't YECists protesting the teaching of geology and physics? Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.
YECists do not think the scientific model is faulty. They believe that the way we interpret data is often misguided. So, Creationists aren't protesting the teaching of geology and physics (most aren't even protesting the teaching of evolution).
By the way, I am just telling you what YECist's viewpoints are. I am not in any way claiming that YEC is the superior model. (Personally, I think Creationism has a long way to go with geology.)
™ Version 4.2