Hello Randman,
You wrote:
Wrong on what point?
1.Do you deny he faked his data?
2. Do you deny evos taught the Biogenetic law as factual even when it wasn't? and did so for a full 50 years after everyone in the field knew it was wrong?
3. Do you deny that recapitulation theory, also taught, is wrong?
4. How about the claims of the phylotypic stage, which was based on Haeckel's data according to Richardson in his 1997 study?
Exactly how am I wrong on any of my claims relative to Haeckel?
A discussion of your questions is probably off topic in this thread. Why don't you discuss the points one to three here [1]? The thread is intended to explore the following article [2], wherein Richardson revises his positions on Haeckel's theory and drawings - which I suppose has some consequences for your favourite arguments.
Finally, your last point is in my opinion irrelevant for the ToE. If you don't agree, I would propose to discuss the topic in this thread [3].
-Bernd
[1]
Message 1[2]
MK Rich Ardson - MK Blog Rich[3]
Message 1
This message has been edited by bernd, 10-Feb-2006 12:04 AM