Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,838 Year: 4,095/9,624 Month: 966/974 Week: 293/286 Day: 14/40 Hour: 3/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Falsifying Creation
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17827
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 136 of 141 (317624)
06-04-2006 3:03 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by trh373
05-29-2006 2:07 AM


quote:
Laws imply a law maker.
This is essentially an equivocation, reastign on two different ues of "law". The sorts of laws passed by Parliaments or enacted by Kings are one thing. The underlying rwgularities of nature are quite another. The fact that we use the word "law" for each does not justify equating them.
quote:
Creations imply a creator
This amounts to begging the question. People refer to "creation" because it was assumed that the universe was created. However that does not make that assumption any less of an assumption.
quote:
If something must physically exist, if must be created.
So if I find a pebble on the beach, was that created ? How do you know ?
I

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by trh373, posted 05-29-2006 2:07 AM trh373 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024