quote:
Laws imply a law maker.
This is essentially an equivocation, reastign on two different ues of "law". The sorts of laws passed by Parliaments or enacted by Kings are one thing. The underlying rwgularities of nature are quite another. The fact that we use the word "law" for each does not justify equating them.
quote:
Creations imply a creator
This amounts to begging the question. People refer to "creation" because it was assumed that the universe was created. However that does not make that assumption any less of an assumption.
quote:
If something must physically exist, if must be created.
So if I find a pebble on the beach, was that created ? How do you know ?
I