a.) First, a new finding that would challenge TOE would have to be tested by a seperate group or groups to verify findings.
b.) Second, the question is if such data required a new theory all together, or simply a modification of TOE. (which has been revised numerous times in the 150 years since its been around)
c.) Wouldn't mean squat for creationism, since creationism is psuedoscience with no scientific backing. If it was a legitimate alternative, it would have been seriously disccussed and considered as such already. It has never met the qualitifictions, nor properly explained teh numerous amounts of evidence discovered. (Which do support TOE.)
™ Version 4.2
