Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,787 Year: 4,044/9,624 Month: 915/974 Week: 242/286 Day: 3/46 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Creationism/ID as Science

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationism/ID as Science
PurpleYouko
Member
Posts: 714
From: Columbia Missouri
Joined: 11-11-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 66 of 249 (282009)
01-27-2006 2:52 PM 		Reply to: Message 65 by bwade226
01-26-2006 9:23 PM

Re: ID not a science
It is true most of the evidence towards ID is holes in evolution, but is this wrong? Just because it isn't direct evidence for ID doesn't mean it shouldnt be used.
​
Gaps or holes in any one theory can never be used as positive evidence for any other theory, competing or otherwise.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by bwade226, posted 01-26-2006 9:23 PM bwade226 has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024