Creationism/ID as Science

Agreed. However, a question: What would it be called when you're at 'someone did it'? For example, there's a glass on my desk. How did it get there? Well, somebody put it there.
Can't be falsified, as there's at least one person (me) with the means, motive, and opportunity. Try to come up with a naturalistic explanation, and you'll fail miserably. Is this unscientific, though? It makes no useful predictions, cannot be falsified, and, besides the 'who', it is the end of further inquiry.And yes, it's not the same, as both the hypothesized agent and method are proven to exist; but still, is it scientific?This message has been edited by DominionSeraph, 08-19-2005 02:26 AM

Yes, but isn't there a point where you do you have reason? Seems to me that 'someone did it' is not inherently unscientific. You can bring in a 'someone' if one is needed, like how there's no problem bringing one in to explain how this glass got on my desk. So, Creationism/ID could, at some point, be scientific.