Creationism/ID as Science

ID may not be a science yet, mostly because it relies mostly on faith. Faith is something that isn't science, can't be proven, but most people acknowledge that it is still there. It is true most of the evidence towards ID is holes in evolution, but is this wrong? Just because it isn't direct evidence for ID doesn't mean it shouldnt be used. Lastly, will evidence for ID come about? Most people don't think there will be, because it relies solely on faith. This might mean you will be waiting a long time.