Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationism/ID as Science
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days)
Posts: 382
From: Westminster,CO, USA
Joined: 02-04-2006


Message 78 of 249 (291341)
03-01-2006 9:37 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Monk
08-17-2005 9:52 AM


Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution
No you are wrong. Creationists would like to have this be taught. But, this will never happen. What their main concern is that in the absence of any valid evidence, this is being forced as a FACT. Some of the most brilliant scientists demand evidence, scrutinize facts very intensively before making any judgement on every other issue. When it comes to EVOLUTION, they treat this as a Holy Cow with all reverence in spite of the holes and missing evidence. Why is this prejudice only for Evolution and nothing else?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Monk, posted 08-17-2005 9:52 AM Monk has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by subbie, posted 03-01-2006 9:59 PM inkorrekt has replied

  
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days)
Posts: 382
From: Westminster,CO, USA
Joined: 02-04-2006


Message 80 of 249 (327641)
06-29-2006 11:00 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by subbie
03-01-2006 9:59 PM


Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution
In the school text books on science, evolution is marked as facts. In one of the states, the school board adopted a policy to put a sticker to the effect that Evolution is only a theory which is yet to be verified.This has becomea national news and was being fiercely debated.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by subbie, posted 03-01-2006 9:59 PM subbie has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by nwr, posted 06-29-2006 11:41 PM inkorrekt has not replied
 Message 91 by ramoss, posted 06-30-2006 4:28 PM inkorrekt has not replied

  
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days)
Posts: 382
From: Westminster,CO, USA
Joined: 02-04-2006


Message 113 of 249 (329771)
07-08-2006 1:57 AM
Reply to: Message 82 by Rob
06-30-2006 12:43 AM


Turn this around
Everything that is said about Faith applies equally to Evolution. If creation is based on religion, evolution is also based on the religion of Atheism. In fact, it takes more faith to believe in Evolution than to believe in Creation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Rob, posted 06-30-2006 12:43 AM Rob has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by ReverendDG, posted 07-08-2006 2:23 AM inkorrekt has replied
 Message 132 by obvious Child, posted 08-27-2006 5:11 PM inkorrekt has not replied

  
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days)
Posts: 382
From: Westminster,CO, USA
Joined: 02-04-2006


Message 115 of 249 (334331)
07-22-2006 6:09 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by ReverendDG
07-08-2006 2:23 AM


Re: Turn this around
The number of those Scientists who believe in Intelligent Design is growing. You may not like this. But, this is the fact.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by ReverendDG, posted 07-08-2006 2:23 AM ReverendDG has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by nator, posted 07-22-2006 8:29 PM inkorrekt has replied
 Message 117 by ramoss, posted 07-22-2006 9:01 PM inkorrekt has not replied

  
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days)
Posts: 382
From: Westminster,CO, USA
Joined: 02-04-2006


Message 118 of 249 (334599)
07-23-2006 7:02 PM
Reply to: Message 116 by nator
07-22-2006 8:29 PM


Re: Turn this around
I will get some statistics for you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by nator, posted 07-22-2006 8:29 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by MUTTY6969, posted 07-27-2006 6:27 AM inkorrekt has replied

  
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days)
Posts: 382
From: Westminster,CO, USA
Joined: 02-04-2006


Message 127 of 249 (343869)
08-27-2006 2:48 AM
Reply to: Message 119 by MUTTY6969
07-27-2006 6:27 AM


Re: Turn this around
Yes, you can turn this around. But, facts remain the same. Evolution has hijacked Science. REal Science was practised before Darwin. After Darwin, Science has never been Science.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by MUTTY6969, posted 07-27-2006 6:27 AM MUTTY6969 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by qed, posted 08-27-2006 3:05 PM inkorrekt has replied
 Message 131 by obvious Child, posted 08-27-2006 5:06 PM inkorrekt has not replied
 Message 133 by ReverendDG, posted 08-27-2006 6:04 PM inkorrekt has not replied

  
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days)
Posts: 382
From: Westminster,CO, USA
Joined: 02-04-2006


Message 200 of 249 (345559)
08-31-2006 9:28 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by qed
08-27-2006 3:05 PM


Re: please explain
Newton's observation led to the understanding of the force of gravity. Darwin's observation has only led to the Hijacking of Science. In other words instead of verified or observable facts, Science has been turned into some sort of study based on assumptions, speculations, predictions and extrapolations.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by qed, posted 08-27-2006 3:05 PM qed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by Archer Opteryx, posted 08-31-2006 9:34 PM inkorrekt has not replied
 Message 203 by Dr Adequate, posted 08-31-2006 10:13 PM inkorrekt has not replied
 Message 217 by obvious Child, posted 09-01-2006 11:23 PM inkorrekt has not replied

  
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days)
Posts: 382
From: Westminster,CO, USA
Joined: 02-04-2006


Message 232 of 249 (346311)
09-03-2006 11:06 PM
Reply to: Message 207 by Parasomnium
09-01-2006 3:52 AM


Re: Selective blindness
Watermelons and Jelly fish are both 96% water, does that mean they are biologically related?
This is similar to other assumptions. There are only 20 amino acids and according to the principle of structure and activity, for a given biological activity, specific structures of peptides and proteins are necessary. There are also biological limitations. We observe the same peptides and protiens in many species. Does it mean that these species are related?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by Parasomnium, posted 09-01-2006 3:52 AM Parasomnium has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 233 by kuresu, posted 09-03-2006 11:19 PM inkorrekt has not replied
 Message 235 by Chiroptera, posted 09-04-2006 1:49 PM inkorrekt has not replied

  
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days)
Posts: 382
From: Westminster,CO, USA
Joined: 02-04-2006


Message 245 of 249 (353316)
09-30-2006 6:02 PM
Reply to: Message 239 by PaulK
09-07-2006 2:13 AM


Re: IS ID Science?
No, no one claimed that it is science. All it was supposed to do is to provide a speculation of explanation to the origins about which Evolution is totally silent. Call it science or whatever.
On the other hand, no evidence has ever been provided for any evolutionary processes. Yet it is claimed to be factual science which can never be questioned or challenged. Why?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 239 by PaulK, posted 09-07-2006 2:13 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 246 by PaulK, posted 09-30-2006 6:07 PM inkorrekt has not replied
 Message 247 by Admin, posted 09-30-2006 9:16 PM inkorrekt has not replied
 Message 248 by ReverendDG, posted 10-01-2006 12:20 AM inkorrekt has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024