Author
|
Topic: Creationism/ID as Science
|
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days) Posts: 382 From: Westminster,CO, USA Joined: 02-04-2006
|
|
Message 78 of 249 (291341)
03-01-2006 9:37 PM
|
Reply to: Message 11 by Monk 08-17-2005 9:52 AM
|
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution
No you are wrong. Creationists would like to have this be taught. But, this will never happen. What their main concern is that in the absence of any valid evidence, this is being forced as a FACT. Some of the most brilliant scientists demand evidence, scrutinize facts very intensively before making any judgement on every other issue. When it comes to EVOLUTION, they treat this as a Holy Cow with all reverence in spite of the holes and missing evidence. Why is this prejudice only for Evolution and nothing else?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 11 by Monk, posted 08-17-2005 9:52 AM | | Monk has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 79 by subbie, posted 03-01-2006 9:59 PM | | inkorrekt has replied |
|
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days) Posts: 382 From: Westminster,CO, USA Joined: 02-04-2006
|
|
Message 80 of 249 (327641)
06-29-2006 11:00 PM
|
Reply to: Message 79 by subbie 03-01-2006 9:59 PM
|
|
Re: Creationism cannot displace evolution
In the school text books on science, evolution is marked as facts. In one of the states, the school board adopted a policy to put a sticker to the effect that Evolution is only a theory which is yet to be verified.This has becomea national news and was being fiercely debated.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 79 by subbie, posted 03-01-2006 9:59 PM | | subbie has seen this message but not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 81 by nwr, posted 06-29-2006 11:41 PM | | inkorrekt has not replied | | Message 91 by ramoss, posted 06-30-2006 4:28 PM | | inkorrekt has not replied |
|
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days) Posts: 382 From: Westminster,CO, USA Joined: 02-04-2006
|
|
Message 113 of 249 (329771)
07-08-2006 1:57 AM
|
Reply to: Message 82 by Rob 06-30-2006 12:43 AM
|
|
Turn this around
Everything that is said about Faith applies equally to Evolution. If creation is based on religion, evolution is also based on the religion of Atheism. In fact, it takes more faith to believe in Evolution than to believe in Creation.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 82 by Rob, posted 06-30-2006 12:43 AM | | Rob has not replied |
|
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days) Posts: 382 From: Westminster,CO, USA Joined: 02-04-2006
|
Re: Turn this around
The number of those Scientists who believe in Intelligent Design is growing. You may not like this. But, this is the fact.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 114 by ReverendDG, posted 07-08-2006 2:23 AM | | ReverendDG has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 116 by nator, posted 07-22-2006 8:29 PM | | inkorrekt has replied | | Message 117 by ramoss, posted 07-22-2006 9:01 PM | | inkorrekt has not replied |
|
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days) Posts: 382 From: Westminster,CO, USA Joined: 02-04-2006
|
|
Message 118 of 249 (334599)
07-23-2006 7:02 PM
|
Reply to: Message 116 by nator 07-22-2006 8:29 PM
|
|
Re: Turn this around
I will get some statistics for you.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 116 by nator, posted 07-22-2006 8:29 PM | | nator has not replied |
|
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days) Posts: 382 From: Westminster,CO, USA Joined: 02-04-2006
|
Re: Turn this around
Yes, you can turn this around. But, facts remain the same. Evolution has hijacked Science. REal Science was practised before Darwin. After Darwin, Science has never been Science.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 119 by MUTTY6969, posted 07-27-2006 6:27 AM | | MUTTY6969 has not replied |
|
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days) Posts: 382 From: Westminster,CO, USA Joined: 02-04-2006
|
|
Message 200 of 249 (345559)
08-31-2006 9:28 PM
|
Reply to: Message 129 by qed 08-27-2006 3:05 PM
|
|
Re: please explain
Newton's observation led to the understanding of the force of gravity. Darwin's observation has only led to the Hijacking of Science. In other words instead of verified or observable facts, Science has been turned into some sort of study based on assumptions, speculations, predictions and extrapolations.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 129 by qed, posted 08-27-2006 3:05 PM | | qed has not replied |
|
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days) Posts: 382 From: Westminster,CO, USA Joined: 02-04-2006
|
Re: Selective blindness
Watermelons and Jelly fish are both 96% water, does that mean they are biologically related? This is similar to other assumptions. There are only 20 amino acids and according to the principle of structure and activity, for a given biological activity, specific structures of peptides and proteins are necessary. There are also biological limitations. We observe the same peptides and protiens in many species. Does it mean that these species are related?
|
inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6081 days) Posts: 382 From: Westminster,CO, USA Joined: 02-04-2006
|
|
Message 245 of 249 (353316)
09-30-2006 6:02 PM
|
Reply to: Message 239 by PaulK 09-07-2006 2:13 AM
|
|
Re: IS ID Science?
No, no one claimed that it is science. All it was supposed to do is to provide a speculation of explanation to the origins about which Evolution is totally silent. Call it science or whatever. On the other hand, no evidence has ever been provided for any evolutionary processes. Yet it is claimed to be factual science which can never be questioned or challenged. Why?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 239 by PaulK, posted 09-07-2006 2:13 AM | | PaulK has replied |
|