Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,877 Year: 4,134/9,624 Month: 1,005/974 Week: 332/286 Day: 53/40 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationism/ID as Science
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 38 of 249 (234494)
08-18-2005 12:42 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by Monk
08-18-2005 11:53 AM


Re: Classical != Newtonian
Newtonian mechanics is imbedded everywhere in our world.
In what way exactly?
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Monk, posted 08-18-2005 11:53 AM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Monk, posted 08-18-2005 1:23 PM Wounded King has replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 40 of 249 (234562)
08-18-2005 2:47 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Monk
08-18-2005 1:23 PM


Re: Classical != Newtonian
You left out my interest in psychical research.
I ask because I personally don't see Newtonian physics to be embedded in our world, only in our systems of knowledge. On re-reading your post I see that you went on to talk about a variety of human efforts presumably these now constitute 'our world'. I had thought you were making some sort of platonist argument about Newtonian mathematics being integral to 'our world'.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Monk, posted 08-18-2005 1:23 PM Monk has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Monk, posted 08-18-2005 3:04 PM Wounded King has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 172 of 249 (344965)
08-30-2006 3:20 AM
Reply to: Message 171 by Hughes
08-30-2006 2:49 AM


As seen in the genetic transfer of information from one generation to the next, and from one cell to the next.
Can you specifically tie the steps of that process to DNA replicaton either transgenerationally or in a cell lineage. The only bits I can see are some decoding followed by some transfering, it doesn't seem to be a congruent system.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by Hughes, posted 08-30-2006 2:49 AM Hughes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 191 by Hughes, posted 08-31-2006 3:38 PM Wounded King has replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 173 of 249 (344966)
08-30-2006 3:22 AM
Reply to: Message 171 by Hughes
08-30-2006 2:49 AM


And was it the Institute that promoted ID in the classroom or misguided school board members?
Um, is the answer both?
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by Hughes, posted 08-30-2006 2:49 AM Hughes has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 195 of 249 (345513)
08-31-2006 6:16 PM
Reply to: Message 191 by Hughes
08-31-2006 3:38 PM


The who with the what now?
OK, now I'm confused.
I assumed that by transgenerationally you meant inheritance through a germ line as seen in multicellular organism, and maybe arguably some wierdo unicellular ones, and that by cell lineage you meant just that, a lineage of cells descended from one or a group of progenitor cells and inheriting the genetic and possibly epigenetic character of those progenitor cells.
But now you are going to a completely different field of molecular biology and discussing cell/cell communication and signal transduction.
This has absoloutely nothing to do with the transgenerational transmission of genetic information. If you think it does then we really require a rationale beyond your assumptions based on the descriptions you've read.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by Hughes, posted 08-31-2006 3:38 PM Hughes has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024