Agobot writes:
Let's start one by one. Why does this utter nonsense get a free pass, if religion and atheism are on equal footing on EvC:
From "Confidence in evolutionary science" thread, post 31, discussing emergent properties:
Captain Stormfield???(please link to the messages you quote) writes:
"How many atoms are in that bridge I mentioned above? Does not each of them have to "constantly move and interact in an organised fashion" just as surely and predictably as the atoms in your body? Is it your impression that bridge atoms behave differently than cell atoms?"
What has this extract to do with atheism, and what makes you think this new member is an atheist? Are you confusing methodological naturalism (science) with atheism?
™ Version 4.2
