antiLIE writes:
I am not misusing the word nor am I setting up a straw man and taking advantage of people's ignorance.
Yes you are. You where told:
Taz writes:
When science text books use the term, they are using it to refer to many many many tiny little changes in a population over a very long time added together.
You even posted:
antiLIE writes:
macroevolution is thought of as the compounded effects of microevolution. Thus, the distinction between micro- and macroevolution is not a fundamental one - the only difference between them is of time and scale
Yet you still are found to be promoting a strawman when saying rubbish like this:
antiLIE writes:
How is this not crock to duck ideology?
For a croc to turn into a duck, or the sudden appearance of feathers you are leaving out the "
time" factor of macroevolution and the compounded effects of microevolution. This is a misuse of the word and a total setup to agrue a strawman.
™ Version 4.2
