Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,760 Year: 4,017/9,624 Month: 888/974 Week: 215/286 Day: 22/109 Hour: 0/3


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Scientific Fact versus Interpretation

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Scientific Fact versus Interpretation
nator
Member (Idle past 2195 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001

Normal Thread Display
Message 99 of 144 (296440)
03-18-2006 9:04 AM 		Reply to: Message 89 by Buzsaw
03-16-2006 10:34 PM

how could the Flood do this?
This isn't the Grand Canyon, buz. It's Canyon de Chelly.
​
How could a massive worldwide flood possibly form this rock spire?:
​
​
This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Buzsaw, posted 03-16-2006 10:34 PM Buzsaw has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by Faith, posted 03-18-2006 9:10 AM nator has not replied
  
nator
Member (Idle past 2195 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001

Normal Thread Display
Message 102 of 144 (296443)
03-18-2006 9:10 AM 		Reply to: Message 98 by Silent H
03-18-2006 4:50 AM

Here is a link to that paper. Please examine it and show examples of how they engage in sheer speculation, and do not allow for testing of their hypothesis... indeed that they do not engage in testing themselves.
​
It is only by addressing the actual research underlying claims made by science can one make statements as damning as the ones you have made.
​
Predictions:
​
1)Faith will not look at the paper and will ignore this reply.
​
2)Faith will look at the paper, will decide she doesn't want to bother trying to understand it, and just decide that this discussion isn't worth her time.
​
3)Faith will accuse you of "needling" her and then condemn all people who question her as being dishonest or somesuch.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by Silent H, posted 03-18-2006 4:50 AM Silent H has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by Faith, posted 03-18-2006 9:12 AM nator has not replied
  
nator
Member (Idle past 2195 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001

Normal Thread Display
Message 120 of 144 (296639)
03-19-2006 5:35 PM 		Reply to: Message 119 by Faith
03-19-2006 4:59 PM

Re: Interpretation as Fact
quote:
Crash, there are a million ways to TEST those results and that is why they are accepted in courtrooms. They've BEEN tested. There have to have been countless comparisons of DNA samples belonging to living people to show its correspondence to relatedness.
​
Oh, so you DO accept that genes are the basis for all heredity?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Faith, posted 03-19-2006 4:59 PM Faith has not replied
  
nator
Member (Idle past 2195 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001

Normal Thread Display
Message 141 of 144 (296788)
03-20-2006 11:11 AM 		Reply to: Message 131 by Faith
03-20-2006 8:29 AM

Re: Interpretation as Fact
quote:
You can't require me to read an entire article, holmes.
​
LOL!!
​
Oh, poor little dear, being expected to read an entire article!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by Faith, posted 03-20-2006 8:29 AM Faith has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024