Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 46/109 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Scientific Fact versus Interpretation

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Scientific Fact versus Interpretation
ramoss
Member (Idle past 638 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 43 of 144 (295652)
03-15-2006 5:31 PM 		Reply to: Message 41 by Faith
03-15-2006 5:03 PM

Re: Let's try to examine one of these issues
It is more that just 'reminds' them of such and such. There is the chemical analsysis. There is the radiometic dating of those rocks. There is the fact that the rocks that are LOWER in the strata are older, which is just as you would think would happen if things got formed layer by layer.
​
It is just not 'some similarity'.. but a much deeper analysis than that.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Faith, posted 03-15-2006 5:03 PM Faith has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Faith, posted 03-15-2006 5:43 PM ramoss has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024