I note Holmes that the summary of that paper is yet another refutation of Faiths idea about "interpretations" being offered as "fact".
In about 5 sentences we see:
quote:
... that are commonly interpreted as suture zones...
quote:
...suggest that fabrics related to assembly...
quote:
... the agreement between these data sets suggests that...
quote:
... and may record assembly of...
quote:
...geochronologic data suggest that...
quote:
...we propose that ... may have involved a complex...
This reaally puts the lie to the kind of nonsense that some here are spouting.
And then we have this wonderful line!!! Worthy of a lite POTM and really caps off the entire debate:
Faith writes:
You can't require me to read an entire article, holmes.
Oh dear, an
entire article.