People Don't Know What Creation Science Is

The creation model predicts--by its very nature of what creation is--that life appeared suddenly and fully formed

Specifically, the second law of thermodynamics is the mechanism that makes macroevolution impossible.

That depends on what caused life, though

Creationists believe that the evidence reveals that life cannot be explianed in terms of continuing natural processes but that some things must be attributed to completed processes that are no longer continuing. In this respect, both models simply need to address life as it continues under their respective models. In this regard, the laws of thermodynamics are only a problem for the evolutionists.

processes that are no longer continuing.

All you get when radiation mutates a gene is just a varied form of what already existed. This process cannot change anything into something fundamentally different.

I think I have done a fairly good job at trying to express how it is that creation science is a scientific study of the evidence just as evolution is

with reasons and theories from the creation model, confirmed with actual agreed upon universal laws such as the first and second laws of thermodynamics.

I just wanted to show *why* creation science is a science.

Creation Science itself is a study of the evidence, not of God or the Bible. It has nothing to do with religion or God directly.

However, for those who have faith in God, it has consequences. If the Bible is truth, then how we respond to it matters alot.

I also answered this question: "How does creation science not violate the second laws of thermodynamics?" when it was asked by someone else.

I am not going to keep answering the same thing everytime someone else wants to ask it.

Not only does the Second Law point back to creation;

The Second Law is a little more detailed and can be expressed in several ways, all of which can be shown equivilent. There's Classical Thermodynamics, Statistical Thermodynamics and Informational Thermodynamics.In each case, entropy is a measure of the lost usefulness of the system. In classical it measures the useful energy which must be converted to nonusable heat energy. In statistical it measures the probability of the structured arrangement of the system--with the state of disorganization being most probable and in informational it measures the amount of garbled information, or noise, that accompanies the transmission of information by the system.These Laws apply to the whole universe. These Laws predict a gloomy future for the cosmos and indeed if evolution were true, this would be a gloom and doom situation for sure.

I wondered why you, personally, are so opposed to discovering that life might be created rather than evolved?

I think the fact that you all seem to think that creation science has to do with religion or God proves that you don't "already know" just what creation science really is.

I recommended the very source needed to see the difference. "What is Creation Science?" Morris/Parker