EvC Forum: People Don't Know What Creation Science Is

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: People Don't Know What Creation Science Is

NosyNed

Member

Posts: 9004

From: Canada

Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 16 of 336 (500948)
03-03-2009 2:59 PM

Reply to: Message 15 by Kelly
03-03-2009 2:58 PM

Reading

Morris claims that evolutionary theory should predict a continuum of elements on the periodic table, where we would see gradations between hydrogen and helium, helium and lithium, etc. "transitional" species between the all of the elements as one evolved into the next complex. Creation science, on the other hand, predicts that the elements should all neatly fit into categories that are discreet, even able to be organized into some form of table or something. Voila! Looks like the evidence supports CS!

Did you read the above passage?

This message is a reply to:
	Message 15 by Kelly, posted 03-03-2009 2:58 PM		Kelly has not replied

NosyNed

Member

Posts: 9004

From: Canada

Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 269 of 336 (501529)
03-06-2009 3:15 PM

Reply to: Message 266 by Kelly
03-06-2009 3:09 PM

Faith and science

You have said over and over that faith has nothing to do with the discussion; it is science that you are talking about.

Evolution really does have nothing to do with faith. You are being very disrespectful a n d showing that you really do think that this discussion is about religion and god and faith when you insist that if CatholicScientist argues against your scientific points (like the 2LOT) then he is not a real believer. He can be a very strong believer and still understand and accept the science. You have no right to claim otherwise when you don't know him.

You are showing, at best, inconsistency, at worst, dishonesty.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 266 by Kelly, posted 03-06-2009 3:09 PM		Kelly has not replied

NosyNed

Member

Posts: 9004

From: Canada

Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 314 of 336 (501658)
03-07-2009 10:34 AM

Reply to: Message 310 by Kelly
03-07-2009 7:23 AM

Using facts

We have their fossilized bones which appear suddenly in the fossil record with no apparent linking backwards.

You make your judgments on a number of things you think are facts but which are not.

Your statement above is not true. There is lots of linking backwards.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 310 by Kelly, posted 03-07-2009 7:23 AM		Kelly has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

4 online now:	AZPaul3, kjsimons, Phat, Taq
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,865 Year: 4,122/9,624 Month: 993/974 Week: 320/286 Day: 41/40 Hour: 7/6