Something assumed to be true for the sake of an argument.
How would a tenative conclusion be better than a axiomatic reality?
Because it is at least based on some evidence (checked against the objective evidence of reality, ground truthed, etc), and the tentativity is recognized. When you assume a truth you sometimes forget that it is not based on any evidence.
And a "self-evident truth" is something that is assumed to be true because it appears to be. self-evident truth - noun an assumption that is basic to an argument [syn: basic assumption] You end up back at axiom, something assumed to be true for the sake of the argument.
Bertot's been around this issue before (first thread of his) and refused to accept it then. All he has done here is rehash all his old arguments with no new understanding.