Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,869 Year: 4,126/9,624 Month: 997/974 Week: 324/286 Day: 45/40 Hour: 4/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Laws of Attraction: The seduction of Evolutionary Psychology?
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5900 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 93 of 102 (353082)
09-29-2006 9:08 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by Silent H
09-28-2006 7:23 AM


Re: bump: new evidence counters some EP claims
Hi Holmes.
I'm not sure you're reading the article correctly. Although the authors do say that "attractiveness" is based more on processing than symmetry, they don't say that symmetry isn't a component of the ease of processing they noted. Given the ubiquity of image searching behavior (which is basically what they found) across the spectrum of the animal world in everything from insects to primates (for predation, predator avoidance, mate selection, etc), I would have been more surprised if humans didn't do the same. It IS interesting that they seem to have isolated the behavior, though.
Thus it appears that brain processes might create a general selective function which does not rely on specific evolutionary benefits.
This is a huge step beyond what the authors are claiming, however. Image searching has a quite valid evolutionary explanation that has been borne out through experimentation and observation. I'm not clear how you can make the statement that this "does not rely on specific evolutionary benefits". Perhaps you can clarify your argument here - I may be misunderstanding what you are saying.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by Silent H, posted 09-28-2006 7:23 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by Silent H, posted 09-29-2006 2:33 PM Quetzal has replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5900 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 95 of 102 (353191)
09-29-2006 4:03 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by Silent H
09-29-2006 2:33 PM


Re: bump: new evidence counters some EP claims
Okay. I guess we're more or less on the same sheet of music. I was just struck by the way you phrased that last part. Since I wasn't involved in your previous discussion, I don't have any comment on that element.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Silent H, posted 09-29-2006 2:33 PM Silent H has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024