Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,751 Year: 4,008/9,624 Month: 879/974 Week: 206/286 Day: 13/109 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationists: Why is Evolution Bad Science?
runningman97
Inactive Member


Message 163 of 283 (297355)
03-22-2006 4:11 PM


Evolution is bad science because there is not enough evidence to justify it. I don't blame Darwin for this, it's all very well to come up with a theory that may have seemed plausible at the time and was worth investigating. In Darwin's time, the cell was thought to be a blob of jelly with nothing much inside. Now we know that it is incredibly complex, containing molecular machines made up of tens to hundreds of interacting parts. Darwin was also concerned about the lack of fossil evidence but thought that intermediate forms would be found. After 150 years, no geniune evidence has been found, it's all been either misunderstanding or fraud. No other scientific theory has stood for so long with such a lack of supporting evidence. The only reason i believe the theory is still in existance is that most scientists are afraid of the alternative.

Replies to this message:
 Message 164 by NosyNed, posted 03-22-2006 4:51 PM runningman97 has not replied
 Message 165 by Chiroptera, posted 03-22-2006 5:37 PM runningman97 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024