Please demonstrate how this is not contradictory, otherwise, its obvious that we are justified in rejecting your conclusion:
You'll notice a direct contradiction afterwards, when she says there is a load of evidence that life sprang from a single cell in the next sentence after she mentions its speculation.
I think if you actually read what you quoted you will see that there is no contradiction
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evolution doesn't even have anything to say at this point about how the very first single-celled organisms came into being. There isn't any evidence one way or another, so until there is, it's all speculative
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and then
lo and behold there is evidence for the 1st claim being true! No speculation at all!
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
However there's loads of evidence that from the first few types of single-celled organisms to come about, all other life later sprang.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not to mention, the how is answered in the 2nd claim as well! So Evolution has begun to explain the how (life sprang from the first few types of single-celled organisms) from the 1st claim. Thats also contradictory.
So Abiogenesis would be both a part of Evolution and not a part of Evolution at the same time in the same sense, right guys?
Edited by Casey Powell, : No reason given.
Edited by Casey Powell, : No reason given.