Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Creationists: Why is Evolution Bad Science?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationists: Why is Evolution Bad Science?
Peg
Member (Idle past 4955 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008

Normal Thread Display
Message 252 of 283 (553020)
04-01-2010 8:39 AM 		Reply to: Message 251 by Taq
03-31-2010 12:16 PM

from what i've read, macroevolution rests on 3 'main' assumptions
​
The first is that mutations are the starting block in the evolution of new species.
​
The 2nd is that natural selection leads to the production of new species.
​
and the 3rd is that the fossil record demonstrates these macroevolutionary changes in plants and animals.
​
Before i go on, does this sound correct?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 251 by Taq, posted 03-31-2010 12:16 PM Taq has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by Taq, posted 04-01-2010 11:24 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 254 by Dr Adequate, posted 04-02-2010 3:46 PM Peg has not replied
 Message 257 by RAZD, posted 04-02-2010 8:08 PM Peg has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024