The major problem with your assertion is that the Creationist model can also be said to be broadly supported by evidence. We all have the same evidence, it's just a matter of interpretation based on presuppositions.
It would be a fascinating excercise for you to present this putative "creation model" and contrast it with biology. You'd be the first ever to put together a coherent model that explains all the facts that you claim are open to "interpretation". Unfortunately, it is probably off-topic for this thread. Perhaps you could propose a new topic by presenting this so-called "model"?
™ Version 4.2
