randman writes:
The sheer hysteria of the mainstream scientific establishment in the Smithsonian towards the audacity to dare publish an ID paper is a demonstration of the lack of objectivity within evolutionism that I have been talking about.
Evolutionism? Is that even a word? I mean, it's not a movement, it's a scientific theory.
I think this is part, admittedly a small one, of creating the illusion that there's actually a debate and that there are political interests in the promotion of Evolution in that purported debate with ID/Creationism. Contrast that with ID, where there's an entire "research institute" dedicated to marketing their "theory" to those willing to give it political weight in places as basic as school boards.
Nitpick/rant over.
™ Version 4.2
