Except that we don't "get the results" since the facts keep piling up against the predictions of ToE.
Oh, come on. You know that's absolutely, 100% untrue. And I know just as well as you that, despite being asked repeatedly to tell us what those "facts" actually
are you never will, because you never do.
The Egyptians had a system that worked perfectly well. Every year, this god or that god went through something, brining on spring, the rains, etc,...
Never mind, of course, that their faulty calendar kept meandering all around the year, making it all but impossible for them to accurately predict the annual flooding of the Nile.
In other words, you're completely wrong, and your example actually proves my point - the faulty assumptions underpinning the Egyptian calendar didn't work, and were pretty rapidly exposed as false when the predictions based on them simply didn't come true.
Face it, Randman, you're arguing against a point that should be immediately obvious as true. If you could get results from false models, what would be the use in having correct ones? If lies work just as well as truth, then what value does truth have?